<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Manchester overpays, Salford underpays &#8211; will we have to pay it back?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stevemiddleton.info/2010/02/02/manchester-overpays-salford-underpays-will-we-have-to-pay-it-back/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stevemiddleton.info/2010/02/02/manchester-overpays-salford-underpays-will-we-have-to-pay-it-back/</link>
	<description>Political comment from the streets of Salford</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 19:06:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve Middleton</title>
		<link>http://stevemiddleton.info/2010/02/02/manchester-overpays-salford-underpays-will-we-have-to-pay-it-back/comment-page-1/#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Middleton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 16:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevemiddleton.info/?p=640#comment-302</guid>
		<description>I admit to reading the story on the Manchester Evening News &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/s/1191135_420000_written_off_in_council_mixup&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and David Ottewell&#039;s comment/blog &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.menmedia.co.uk/politics/2010/02/robin-hood-in-reverse/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. If anything I have said here is wrong, I&#039;m sure you&#039;ll be straight onto the M.E.N. to set them straight to? No? Thought not.

My blog piece sets out the story as reported elsewhere, but in my own words.

Frankly I&#039;m amazed you&#039;d entertain defending Manchester City Council&#039;s cavalier attitude (that £420,000 is just &quot;a few thousands pounds&quot;), but then Labour-councils cannot be trusted when it comes to local or national economics.

Proof of that in Salford is staring us in the face: An ice rink and Proms event that cost us hundreds of thousands of pounds and the promise of a 0% council tax rise before opposition councillors have had chance to examine the budget and before the Police &amp; Fire have announced their own precepts.

Labour cannot be trusted with taxpayers money. Period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I admit to reading the story on the Manchester Evening News <a href="http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/s/1191135_420000_written_off_in_council_mixup" rel="nofollow">here</a> and David Ottewell&#8217;s comment/blog <a href="http://blogs.menmedia.co.uk/politics/2010/02/robin-hood-in-reverse/" rel="nofollow">here</a>. If anything I have said here is wrong, I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ll be straight onto the M.E.N. to set them straight to? No? Thought not.</p>
<p>My blog piece sets out the story as reported elsewhere, but in my own words.</p>
<p>Frankly I&#8217;m amazed you&#8217;d entertain defending Manchester City Council&#8217;s cavalier attitude (that £420,000 is just &#8220;a few thousands pounds&#8221;), but then Labour-councils cannot be trusted when it comes to local or national economics.</p>
<p>Proof of that in Salford is staring us in the face: An ice rink and Proms event that cost us hundreds of thousands of pounds and the promise of a 0% council tax rise before opposition councillors have had chance to examine the budget and before the Police &amp; Fire have announced their own precepts.</p>
<p>Labour cannot be trusted with taxpayers money. Period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Merry</title>
		<link>http://stevemiddleton.info/2010/02/02/manchester-overpays-salford-underpays-will-we-have-to-pay-it-back/comment-page-1/#comment-301</link>
		<dc:creator>John Merry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 16:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevemiddleton.info/?p=640#comment-301</guid>
		<description>It is a pity you did not check your facts before you rushed into print. The nine Boroughs Cllr Shannon described as &quot;rich&quot; include three Lib Dem Councils and there was a dispute about liabilty. Your blind following of the line  being pursued by Manchester Lib Dems at the expense of Salford Taxpayers is disappointing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a pity you did not check your facts before you rushed into print. The nine Boroughs Cllr Shannon described as &#8220;rich&#8221; include three Lib Dem Councils and there was a dispute about liabilty. Your blind following of the line  being pursued by Manchester Lib Dems at the expense of Salford Taxpayers is disappointing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
