Filed Under (Salford) by Steve Middleton on 2nd February 2010

I’m absolutely astounded by this story, which was originally brought to my attention by David Ottewell, who blogged about it today.

For those that can’t be bothered to follow those links, the crux of the story is that the 10 local authorities of Greater Manchester all pay Marketing Manchester to, well, market Manchester. I don’t want to get into the value (or otherwise) of councils like Salford paying out taxpayers cash to market another city, but a deal was struck some years ago to split the cost, with 35% to be paid by Manchester and the remaining 65% to be split across the rest of the Greater Manchester councils.

It has since emerged that for the last 6 years, Manchester City Council has been paying 65% and the other Greater Manchester councils have only been paying their share of 35%.

The deputy leader of Manchester City Council has confirmed that from today onwards, the mistake has been rectified – but what about the £420,000 that Manchester has overpaid? Well, Manchester Labour councillor and Deputy Leader Jim Battle is quoted as saying “There was a misunderstanding and it has now been corrected, end of story. It would be bureaucratic nonsense to chase a few thousands pounds.”

I wish £420,000 was only a “few thousands pounds” !!!

Manchester’s loss is Salford’s gain – if Manchester City Council had decided to recoup their overpayment (as would be their right), then that 0% council tax rise that Salford Labour Leader John Merry had proposed for our own city could have been in doubt.

In fact, Salford may still have to repay our underpayment – as opposition councillors in Manchester have reported this shocking accounting error by the Manchester Labour council to the District Auditor.

It just goes to show how little regard Labour have for taxpayers money – they cannot be trusted with our hard earned cash.

A Liberal Democrat council would have immediately recouped a £420,000 overpayment (although I doubt any Lib Dem council would allow such a situation to arise). To claim £420,000 is just “a few thousands pounds” demonstrates a lack of sanity and a complete loss of respect for hardworking taxpayers.

Labour cannot be trusted with your money. Not at a local level and certainly not at a national level.

  • Share/Bookmark


Comments
John Merry on 4th February, 2010 at 4:32 pm

It is a pity you did not check your facts before you rushed into print. The nine Boroughs Cllr Shannon described as “rich” include three Lib Dem Councils and there was a dispute about liabilty. Your blind following of the line being pursued by Manchester Lib Dems at the expense of Salford Taxpayers is disappointing

Steve Middleton on 4th February, 2010 at 4:43 pm

I admit to reading the story on the Manchester Evening News here and David Ottewell’s comment/blog here. If anything I have said here is wrong, I’m sure you’ll be straight onto the M.E.N. to set them straight to? No? Thought not.

My blog piece sets out the story as reported elsewhere, but in my own words.

Frankly I’m amazed you’d entertain defending Manchester City Council’s cavalier attitude (that £420,000 is just “a few thousands pounds”), but then Labour-councils cannot be trusted when it comes to local or national economics.

Proof of that in Salford is staring us in the face: An ice rink and Proms event that cost us hundreds of thousands of pounds and the promise of a 0% council tax rise before opposition councillors have had chance to examine the budget and before the Police & Fire have announced their own precepts.

Labour cannot be trusted with taxpayers money. Period.

Post a comment

 

Name: 
Email: 
URL: 
Comments: 
Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes

Copy Protected by Chetan's WP-CopyProtect.